<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Museums on Roy Rosenzweig Center for History and New Media</title><link>https://rrchnm.org/tags/museums/</link><description>Recent content in Museums on Roy Rosenzweig Center for History and New Media</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://rrchnm.org/tags/museums/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>South Asia Collections at The Met: A Preliminary Computational Look</title><link>https://rrchnm.org/blog/exploring-south-asia-at-the-met-through-data/</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://rrchnm.org/blog/exploring-south-asia-at-the-met-through-data/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Originally published at &lt;a href="https://www.deepthimurali.com/art-history-and-data/south-asia-at-the-met"&gt;https://www.deepthimurali.com/art-history-and-data/south-asia-at-the-met&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Museum metadata is messy metadata (and sometimes, also, just messy in non-computational ways.) But museum metadata is also historical archive that scholars and the public alike ignore.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Every object in a museum collection arrives with a story attached — a donor&amp;rsquo;s name, a date, a department assignment, a classification. Individually, these are administrative details: the bureaucratic residue of how an object got from somewhere else to a vitrine, a storage shelf, or a database entry. But at scale, across thousands of objects and more than a century of acquisitions, these details become historical data. They become a record of &lt;em&gt;how&lt;/em&gt; an institution decided what South Asia was, who got to decide that, and when those decisions were made.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>